Loudoun Policy WatchLocal government, in plain language
Main page › Policy briefs › Brief 1

The data center tradeoff

Data centers pay a large share of the county's bills. What do residents give up, and who decides where they go?

Why this matters to students

Data centers help pay for the schools you attend and keep your family's tax bill lower. They also decide what the land around your neighborhood looks like and how many power lines cross it. The rules being written now will shape Loudoun for decades.

The question

How should Loudoun balance the tax revenue data centers bring against their effects on land, power and neighborhoods?

Background in two minutes

Loudoun is home to the largest concentration of data centers in the world, most of them in the Ashburn and Dulles areas. In the county's fiscal year 2025 budget, data centers produced about 38% of general fund revenue and nearly half of property tax revenue. Most of that comes from the computer equipment inside the buildings, which is taxed at $4.15 per $100 of value.

As of February 2025, county staff counted about 46 million square feet of data centers built or permitted, with roughly 61.5 million more square feet of possible development. Until March 2025, a data center that met zoning standards in industrial areas could be approved by staff without a public vote. Since then, every new one needs a public hearing and a Board decision.

The case for continued data center growth

Supporters point to the money. Data center revenue has let the Board cut the real estate tax rate and the car tax in back-to-back budgets while fully funding the School Board's request, and it produced budget surpluses of $259.6 million and $194 million in recent years.

They also argue that industrial land is the right place for industrial buildings. When the Board narrowly approved a data center near Leesburg Executive Airport in July 2025, the chair said the site was already industrial and an appropriate location. Industry representatives argue that changing the rules for projects already in the pipeline is unfair to companies that planned under the old ones.

The case for tighter limits

Critics argue that each new data center brings costs that don't show up in the budget. Residents who spoke at hearings raised noise, huge buildings near homes, and new high-voltage lines needed to power the growth, and many worry that grid expansion will raise electric bills for households.

Town mayors and residents backed the 2025 rule change because it lets supervisors judge each project on its own effects. Some supervisors now say the county relies too heavily on one industry and should plan for slower growth before it is forced to.

What the county actually did

The Board's votes show a county that has moved from automatic approval toward closer review, often by narrow margins.

Open questions

  • Will the Board approve the proposed 12-month pause on data center and substation votes on Oct. 20, 2026?
  • Will the 17 applications protected by the 2025 grandfathering resolution keep that protection after the county's legal review?
  • What noise, power generation and substation standards will Phase 2 set when it reaches the Planning Commission, expected in February 2027?
  • If data center growth slows, how will the county replace that revenue without raising other taxes?

Go to the source